Cathy and her Dad at the Ale House on First Street in Livermore, California. Livermore’s award winning downtown has undergone the type of transformation we have been working to obtain in Renton
Fountain on First Street in Livermore California
I don’t have to look any further than my own home town of Livermore California (pop 81,000) for a success story of downtown revitalization. Livermore’s downtown struggled for decades as outlying shopping malls and big box stores stripped away its customers and revenue. In the 1970’s and early 1980’s, Cathy and I would steer away from downtown First Street when shopping or going on a date. But in the last decade they have successfully made major changes. Their shops and restaurants are now bustling, and in 2009 they won a national award for their astounding turnaround. When Cathy and I were in Livermore last month, we waited forty minutes to get seated at a popular new downtown restaurant, and it was worth the wait. While we waited we enjoyed a joyful street scene that would be the envy of any city planners. Read more about their award winning transformation in this article from “Main Street News” here. (Or read Livermore’s official downtown plan, with background data, here. )
Interestingly, during the years they were planning and rebuilding their downtown, they also rebuilt their Public Library– but they did not move it to the heart of their downtown. Their gorgeous new library is actually further from the center of town than the old library was, approximately ten blocks away instead of six. Their old library, which is a beautiful building built when I was young, is now used only for storage.
Since I have so much family in Livermore, I’ve visited the city often over the years and watched the change almost as if it is time-lapse photography. The new Livermore downtown is a result of intensive planning, coordinated traffic revisions, major streetscape improvements, and strong business leadership and partnering.
Renton has taken some of these actions, but we have not gotten as much traction as Livermore at bringing customers to our businesses. In Renton during the last 15 years we purchased a downtown car dealership for about half a million dollars, and then spent a few million dollars to create the downtown Piazza Park and the Pavilion Building (which was remodeled from the dealer showroom). Then, we spent about ten million dollars on a parking garage downtown. We spent about half a million partnering with Renton School District, IKEA, and others, to build the IKEA Performing Arts Center. We purchased and tore down a derelict building near the Historical Museum, and then built the Veterans Memorial for about half a million dollars. We rezoned to encourage residential construction on top of businesses, and we worked with private developers to bring some of this about. In addition, in a move I’ve often wished we could take back, we gave Metro the land to build the Transit Center. All of these moves were intended to provide more people pedestrian traffic in downtown.
While we have had some successes in downtown, we clearly have a long ways to go to achieve the successful restaurant and shopping climate that we are looking for. Lately, I now recognize that this is because simply creating traffic does not assure the creation of customers. People have to be immediately interested in shopping or dining when they pass one of our restaurants or stores, or else they will not add to our customer base. It’s the same reason Google makes billions of dollars on the internet, while most newpapers have been losing money on the internet: People visiting Google are often searching for merchants or trying to find service providers, so they respond readily to Google’s ads– but people reading the New York Times are looking for news– ads are just a distraction.
In the case of business districts or the internet, traffic generated by people who are not looking to make purchases will use up road capacity/band width, but will not generate revenue. Common examples of these types of users of Renton’s downtown include motorists driving through from South Seattle to Issaquah, motorists avoiding I-405, bus-riders making tight connections at our transit center, and commuters using our transit center as a park-and-ride. We get tens of thousands of these per day, and we are lucky if we can sell one-in-fifty of them a cup of coffee.
What we really want, and what Livermore has succeeded in capturing, are people headed to downtown BECAUSE they want to go to a downtown restaurant, shop, or entertainment venue… the same reason they are going to Renton’s Landing. To get to this point, the streetscapes, restaurants, shops, and entertainment venues all have to offer what customers are looking for.
One immediate question Renton City Council is facing is whether moving the library downtown will help bring customers to Renton businesses, or at least do it better than other options we might have before us. I am not convinced that moving the library will help. In fact, I think it is possible that library patrons will simply use up more parking and road capacity in our central business district without adding to the business customer base. Like readers of the newspaper in my internet example above, library patrons can not be assumed to be in a “buying” mood. They are very likely to spend no more than a user of the transit center while they are in our downtown. And while it may seem funny to worry about parking now, if the downtown developed the way we would like it to, library parking demand could conflict with business parking demand.
I share the Mayor’s and the rest of Council’s concern about improving our downtown. And I think we should work hard on the next phase of our plan for doing so. I don’t claim to have all the answers, but I do have some ideas. When I look at the Livermore example, the amount of spending we have dedicated to landscape and streetscape in downtown has been minimal. Our 1.5 million dollars spending on Piazza landscape and Veterans Park together accounted for only about ten percent of the 15 million dollars Livermore spent making improvements to beautify their streets and sidewalks in the central business area. We spent most of our money on parking (ten million dollars), something that was important for us but less of a problem in Livermore (which had large undeveloped lots for parking). This makes me think we are overdue for a major streetscape update. But I would not want to do this without something else Livermore enjoyed– a strong commitment by property owners to update/replace their aging buildings as required. We should not commit taxpayer funds without confidence that the private sector is going to do their part. If property owners are not ready to make this commitment this year because of the recession, we may have to wait until enough of them ARE ready to commit.
In addition, we need to continue the Mayor’s current emphasis on crime prevention. I’m glad we are moving toward zero-tolerance of nuisance crimes in the transit center– this facility has generated too many complaints for too long. (If we can’t stop the complaints, I would even be open to the idea of closing the transit center and working with Metro to make the Grady Park and Ride the new place to catch a bus. It would be a shame to let criminals and punks cause us to close the transit center when it is used by so many people– but it would also be wrong to continue to let people get hurt or frightened while trying to use a public facility.) For now, we should see if the new emphasis on crime prevention is going to work.
Lastly, if we decide to move the library downtown, it should be part of a comprehensive plan, with broad consensus, that we collectively feel is our best hope to revitalize our downtown and make the business climate thrive– The same type of planning that revitalized the downtown in my home town. I don’t feel that we are there yet, so I am not ready to vote to move the library.
Cathy’s Mom and Dad at the Ale House in Livermore
Four Generations: Cathy’s Mom, Cathy, our daughter Katie, and her daughter Carolyn enjoying coffee at an independant coffee house on Livermore’s revitalized first street
Livermore’s First Street in 1955
Livermore First Street in 2006
Livermore’s First Street in 2011
Livermore’s old first street buildings are almost hidden behind new landscaping that a Parisian would be proud of
Even the alleys were included in Livermore’s downtown makeover; Public Works price tag for the whole job– about 15 million dollars.
Livremore’s transformation required a strong buy-in and donations from the public
Livermore’s new public library is further from the center of town than the old library
Livermore’s old library– used only for storage since it’s replacement about ten years ago
Here’s how you revitalize downtown – spend $1 million on the following:
3 fulltime officers + supervision and prosecution ~$500,000
Container plantings + gardener – $100,000
Code enforcement officer + prosecution ~ $200,000
Painting (crosswalks, no parking strips) – $50,000
Local Art – $100,000
Flags on light poles ~ $30,000
$1 million is about *half* of what we spend per year on giving the developers of the Landing their fancy streets and garage.
I’ve done a bit of research and libraries patrons are not ‘sticky’ – they do their business and they leave. We can see that at the Cedar River library – no businesses have sprung up around it to service the throngs that have gone in there for over 50 years.
Oh and Downtown Livermore is an awesome palce – we were there two years ago. Having the angled parking and the planting strip next to the road really made you feel comfortable walking around.
If we angled in the parking and went to one lane and added a few planters, we could get a similar effect in DTR for cheap. DRT sidewalks are much narrower than Livermore, but fixing that would cost a lot.
Don’t like getting the largest property tax increase in Renton history? Don’t like having your library sold down the river? Don’t vote for anybody endorsed by Zwicker and Parker, and don’t shop at King and Bunnies.
Good points Randy but I really can’t help but get a bit frustrated with your willingness to move the transit center. Are you aware that there are people who live in the adjacent buildings because they don’t have/want a car or simply can’t drive due to financial and medical constraints? People moved there for those reasons and that is precisely what TOD is for.
Crime sometimes comes with public transportation and that’s just the way it is. It also comes with cars: hit-and-runnners, drunk drivers, drive-by gunners, speeders, carjackers, getaway car drivers, etc. I can’t remember seeing any calls to ban the roads to mitigate that problem. Is it just easier to call for eliminating something that you personally don’t use?
It’s nice to hear from someone who likes the transit center. I mostly hear complaints about it… including from many downtown residents. Do you live in the area?
I’m aware that many of our residents don’t have cars. I’m not recommending closing the transit center at this time, but I should clarify that that we would not have to eliminate bus stops downtown even if we eliminated the transit center.
I should add that our latest “zero-tolerance” enhanced crime prevention efforts near the transit center (started last month after the shooting) seem to be making a difference.
I’d like to see a way to compel Metro to police it’s customers – if a rowdy bar keeps having fist fights, the owner usually has to take responsibility.
I know the city has a nuisance property ordinance, so can the city use that as a threat to get Metro to keep it’s more frisky customers in line?
Yes, I would like to see us do this Ben. I think we have let Metro shift too much of the burden to us. The Transit Center is their facility, and yet they have no one staffing or patrolling it.
I do live in that area and I use the center to catch buses to work, sports games in Seattle, and the airport occasionally. Many of us expect that system to just be there and are probably not as vocal as we should be about supporting it.
I’m not convinced of the effects of zero-tolerance policies. They take from the police the ability to prioritize work and are more of a PR move then anything else. In the short term it works but we need more of a sustainable solution as the crime will reappear once the sweep is over. I really think that getting rid of that private security guard was a very bad move. He did more than many people think and cost a heck of a lot less then 6 sworn police officers walking around looking for jaywalkers and smokers.
Metro should most definitely be paying for this. I don’t know if we have the need for a full regional transit police force yet but they could at least foot the bill for private security.
Move the Transient Center to Liberty Park/Library. May as well turn it over to the criminals and perverts. It’s where Renton is going anyway. Compton and Long Beach are better places to live than Renton anymore. So many people have moved out of Renton. On our street we’ve lost 3 homeowners. 1 to Bellevue, 1 to West Seattle, 1 to Kent. When did Kent and Auburn get the jump on Renton. So sad to see your hometown ruined by ‘leaders’ who don’t care about the people. Just their own wallets.
Nice article. I love what Livermore did to their downtown – I can’t help thinking that moving away from one-way roads would help, as it seems to create almost “half streets,” that don’t seem worth driving down if you can avoid them. Also, I’m guessing their library is more than 15,000 square feet.
We could do so much more with our downtown. Livermore looks like they got it right, unlike Renton. We let the Chamber of Commerce spend taxpayer money and because they lack any creativity or vision. Now we are losing our downtown library spanning the river because a few cheap businessmen in Renton don’t want to spend their own money to improve their own storefronts. A few new businesses that have come in are actually putting effort into making downtown better, while others are pulling the strings at the City of Renton to spend their constituents money to try to benefit private business. This is corruption at its worst. And the few Council members that are being bought by the Chamber and Rotery should be voted out of office for not listening to the Renton voters they were elected to represent. When was the last time there was such an outcry of the public? Obviously, this move should be stopped. Now meetings are being held behind closed doors to “decide” on the future plans of a public service and public structure. We have buildings in the downtown are that have been damaged since the Nisqually earthquake that sit unfixed. We have a gaping hole where another business burnt to the ground, yet the City does nothing about these. There are abandoned houses throughout North and South downtown Renton neighborhoods that are falling apart, overgrown and with broken out windows that the City does not do anything about. But someone sold them on moving our 23,000 square foot asset of a library three blocks and making it less then 15,000 square feet and somehow this will “fix” downtown. Since when are the opinions of those who don’t live, shop and pay taxes in Renton held in more esteem then the the people who actually live here and use the services that are being cut?
Thank you for your photos of your hometown. I love Renton and I hope someday it might be as beautiful as Livermore. I love the architectural trellises and details that make it pedestrian friendly. PLEASE DON’T MOVE THE LIBRARY.
They council still says they will do something with the “old” library building over the river but it will still have to be renovated to do that. So why not renovate and keep the library where the residents put it in the first place.
Turn the new Big Five/pavilion area in to the arts center or teen center. Instead of the opposite.
Thank you for your blog.
Thanks for the nice article about Livermore and your analysis of the problems with downtown Renton. One thing that stuck out for me was the statement that library patrons are not “sticky.” That certainly applies to me, but not just with the library. I go places to accomplish something specific, then leave.
Over the thirty years I have lived in Renton I have patronized the downtown library, McLendon Hardware, Record Stationery (great store!), Lande Feed, Bartell’s Pharmacy, Paul’s Barbershop, a used-records-and CDs store, a candle store, the Post Office, Pickering’s Appliances, restaurants, and stores selling magazines and used books. That’s all in the past because: 1) since retiring I don’t drive though downtown much and don’t go out to eat lunch at all; 2) some businesses moved or folded; and 3) one business was taken over by people who could barely speak English. These days I go downtown mainly to patronize Bernie’s Optical. On occasion I visit the transit center garage to take pictures from the top level.
I have one idea for helping revitalize downtown and it involves the Bank of America building on South Third Street. The side of the bank facing Third should be replaced with a wall that is more attractive to people on the sidewalk. The current wall reminds me of a fortress—something designed to repel anyone coming near. That the building won an architectural award in spite of that wall is astonishing. If every business downtown abutted the sidewalk in that style, downtown would be a place no one would want to go for anything. A cheap cosmetic change like a mural won’t do the job. I suggest that the wall incorporate a door and bigger windows. One can only hope…