One year we put holiday trees at Seatac Airport, took them all out again, and then put them all back. The next year a group put a sign written by athiests right next to a Christmas display at the statehouse, only to have it stolen, and then put back again.
The US Supreme Court just ruled on a similar situation in a park (specifically a monument with the Ten Commandments) finding that cities do not have to allow every single possible religious group to place it’s own monuments right along side other community monuments that have religious as well as historic significance.
While it does not directly address the case of community “Holiday Trees,” the language of the ruling tends to validate my own view that a community of thinking adults ought to be able to tolerate a holiday tree in their community (or statehouse), as they have for a century, without feeling like they must now provide displays for every other religios and non-religious idea that exists in the universe.
I’ll let the lawyers decide for sure what this means for “holiday trees” in our state. But it sounds like good news to me.
Recent Comments